<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hydropeptide Lash helps eyelashes grow -tested and recommended</title>
	<atom:link href="http://truthinaging.com/eyes/hydropeptide-lash-helps-eyelashes-grow-tested-and-recommended/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://truthinaging.com/eyes/hydropeptide-lash-helps-eyelashes-grow-tested-and-recommended/</link>
	<description>Truth in Aging delivers the honest truth about the beauty industry, informing readers about what cosmetics really work and why.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:48:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joanna</title>
		<link>http://truthinaging.com/eyes/hydropeptide-lash-helps-eyelashes-grow-tested-and-recommended/comment-page-1/#comment-32694</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthinaging.com/?p=15962#comment-32694</guid>
		<description>Hi!  You mention seeing a difference on your lower lashes, but the instructions recommend only using it on the upper lashes.  Do you put and extra line of the product on your lower lashline, or does the stuff on the upper lashline get smudged down.  If you do use it on the lower lashline, do you think there is a greater likelihood of getting the product into your eye that way?  Or only for sloppy people? Thanks so much for your help.  I&#039;m very much enjoying your site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!  You mention seeing a difference on your lower lashes, but the instructions recommend only using it on the upper lashes.  Do you put and extra line of the product on your lower lashline, or does the stuff on the upper lashline get smudged down.  If you do use it on the lower lashline, do you think there is a greater likelihood of getting the product into your eye that way?  Or only for sloppy people? Thanks so much for your help.  I&#8217;m very much enjoying your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://truthinaging.com/eyes/hydropeptide-lash-helps-eyelashes-grow-tested-and-recommended/comment-page-1/#comment-20959</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthinaging.com/?p=15962#comment-20959</guid>
		<description>After reading your recommendation for Hydropeptide ($80) I decided to try it. I&#039;m sorry to say that on the three occasions that I used it I woke up to swollen weepy eyes, so I must be allergic to some ingredient in the product.  Interestingly, I have used an entire tube of LiLash ($140) without any problems and great results, but decided to switch because of the prostoglandins.  I&#039;m now trying RapidLash ( $50) without any problems and half the price, but will have to try for a few weeks to see if my long lashes flourish.  My goal is to find a good product that will give me the results without the bad ingredients and without having to pay $100 or more</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading your recommendation for Hydropeptide ($80) I decided to try it. I&#8217;m sorry to say that on the three occasions that I used it I woke up to swollen weepy eyes, so I must be allergic to some ingredient in the product.  Interestingly, I have used an entire tube of LiLash ($140) without any problems and great results, but decided to switch because of the prostoglandins.  I&#8217;m now trying RapidLash ( $50) without any problems and half the price, but will have to try for a few weeks to see if my long lashes flourish.  My goal is to find a good product that will give me the results without the bad ingredients and without having to pay $100 or more</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marta</title>
		<link>http://truthinaging.com/eyes/hydropeptide-lash-helps-eyelashes-grow-tested-and-recommended/comment-page-1/#comment-12769</link>
		<dc:creator>marta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthinaging.com/?p=15962#comment-12769</guid>
		<description>Hi Amber, the litmus test is which one would be a repeat buy and, if funds permit, that would be Hydropeptide. If not, then Folligen is the best value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Amber, the litmus test is which one would be a repeat buy and, if funds permit, that would be Hydropeptide. If not, then Folligen is the best value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amber</title>
		<link>http://truthinaging.com/eyes/hydropeptide-lash-helps-eyelashes-grow-tested-and-recommended/comment-page-1/#comment-12737</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthinaging.com/?p=15962#comment-12737</guid>
		<description>Hey Marta-

I love all your reviews on the eyelash growth products. They are very informative. From all your experiences so far with the existing and new products, which product is the BEST for mainly lengthening the eyelashes? Thank you so much!!

Amber</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Marta-</p>
<p>I love all your reviews on the eyelash growth products. They are very informative. From all your experiences so far with the existing and new products, which product is the BEST for mainly lengthening the eyelashes? Thank you so much!!</p>
<p>Amber</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
